Sling Blade Paper -- essays research papers

Slingblade PaperThe film Slingblade depicts a psychologic totallyy challenged man, Karl Childers, played by Billy Bob Thornton, and his trials and tribulations of life. When he comes out of the moral institution he was residing in, he meets a boy named Frank who accepts him as a human being like no one had previously make to him. The whole pictorial matter shows how this intricate mentally retarded man who was domesticated from all his time in the mental house adapts to the outside world. Throughout all the foul judgment and fierce words sent his way, he maintains a certain level of sanity and civilness throughout the madness. The beginning of the movie starts and he tells his tales of his murders. nowadays whats the runner thing you always assume about a murderer? That they are a bad person and took another persons life, and should pay the harsh penalty for it. However, throughout this movie Karl shows how much of a caring and compassionate person he truly is. Any assumptio ns you had for him at the beginning of the movie gage basically be thrown out the window about a half hour into the movie. The first major(ip) test of this movie was the transition from one world to another that Karl has to go through. This transition shows how hard it is to go from an enclosed, tiny world to an unpredictable, giant world where something is always going on around you. Karl first came to terms with the fact that he would have to adapt to this new world when he talked to a reporter in his latter days in the mental institution. He is talking to Woolridge, who runs the mental institution, and he says to him, I reckon Im gonna have to get used to looking at pretty raft I reckon Im gonna have to get used to them looking at me too. This shows he has some recognition of what life outside the rap is going to be like, he shows, throughout his mental disabilities that he has comprehension for how he is going to have to adapt to live his new life. The second major scene whic h shows him making the transition from one world to another is the scene when he makes friends with the boy. This shows his first adaptation he actually makes outside of the mental institution. He shows that he is capable of leading a normal life despite his mental condition and terrible past. At the beginning of the movie, when you hear that he maliciously murdered two people, you think that he is a terrible and vicious person. This ... ...cause he wants to ensure the happiness and safety of Frank and his mother in the future. Doyle was a precise dangerous man and frequently had drunken rages which intrust the safety of the whole family and anyone else in the general vicinity in danger. This shows how truly caring he was, he sacrificed his own life to improve the lives of two other people that he cared about. He believed that he didnt do anything wrong, and personally I summate with him. He fought for what he believed in and ended up improving the lives of two people he truly c ared about, the closest thing to a real family he ever had.These scenes really show how Karl goes through life as a compassionate person. The public opinion on him is truly opposite, but as the movie goes on you see it more and more. The people that he loves, he truly cares about them more then he cares for himself at times. He was willing to put aside the rest of his life to make sure two friends, rather family members, would live a happy life. Although murder is a terrible way to do it, he ensures their happiness. Karl Childers may be seen as a bad man and a murderer, but to the people that really know him, he is a very loyal and caring individual.

Active Intellect In Aristotle, :: essays research papers

All men by nature swear to know. An indication of this is the delight we take in our mavens for regular apart from their usefulness they are loved for themselves and above all others the feel of sight. This is the foundation of human knowledge Aristotle presents us with in Book of import of the Metaphysics. The next question which we must naturally ask ourselves is, How? How is it that we can have any knowledge at all? We by our very nature desire to know and welove the senses in themselves but what is the relationship between the two and by what faculty are we able to call anything knowledge once sense perception has occurred?Aristotle sets up as his faculty for knowledge both the dressive and the motionless intellects. We begin to have knowledge through sense experience. We cannot know without sense experienceand it is from sense experience that all knowledge is therefore generated. Knowledge for Aristotle is a knowledge of universals, that is, a knowledge of Essences. Thou ght is thus the faculty bywhich we accrue to comprehend universals. And since material objects are a composite unity of essence and existence, it naturally follows that we grasp the universal through our encounter with the particular. What follows is a series of events which leads to knowledge. The passive intellect receives the image from the sense data and it is stamped upon the passive intellect from the material impression. From this stamp the active intellect is to draw out of it and someways make a universal concept from this particular experience. But there is something more at work here. There is something in the mind ( more specifically in the soul) thatsomehow comprehends and makes universals intelligible. Various theories have been postulated concerning this but we shall concentrate on Aristotle and leave the other philosophies for now. What is at work in man is a divine reason essential in mans soul. Somehow man is connected to and shares in divine reason. A distinctio n must be made here. We are not saying that the human souls capacity to grasp universals is in some way a maker or shares in the pure act of God, but that without this divine reason at work in the souls of men no understanding of universals could take place at all. The mind works on the material given to it, that is its potential, and from this material it moves to actuality.

NASA Essay -- National Aeronautics Space Administration Essays

NASAThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, was established in 1958 under the Eisenhower administration. Its main purpose was to act as an independent confidence to direct the nations space missions and research programs. Over the past 45 years, since its inception, NASA has experienced many problems and has received recent negative publicity. NASA has had longstanding decimaterial problems on the inside and with outside contractors. They have also failed to estimate costs and have conducted projects well beyond what their budget dictates. An example of that would be with the failed X-33 project, among others. This analysis volition explore these areas of NASA and provide preliminary recommendations as to how the program can better itself, from management to new vehicles. Although research of National Aeronautics and Space Administrations (NASA) goernment contractors over the last thirty years did not uncover any major allegations of shoddy workmanship or under spec deliverables, it did reveal serious issues with go through to billing fraud and huge bonuses paid out on over budget projects. Over the years there have been numerous allegations of fraud and handle by NASA contractors. Finally in November 2000 the authorities was able to win a settlement against the Boeing Company of Seattle and the Houston-based United Space Alliance for a total of $825,000. In addition to the money that was awarded, these two companies agreed to forfeit any rights they have to collect on $1.2 million in unpaid invoices. This settlement was related to allegations that mendacious claims had been submitted for work supposedly performed between 1986 and 1992 under the NASA Space Shuttle and Space Station Freedom programs. Originally, the Rockwell Space Operations Company (RSOC) was the contractor who was hired to manage the two programs. An RSOC sub-contractor, Omniplan Corporation, is accused of being involved in numerous fraudulent billing activities. The result of this fraud was that the United States was overcharged millions of dollars. The Boeing Company acquired RSOC in 1996 and at that term United Space Alliance took over the management of the two space programs. The government tried to sue Omniplan in 1993, but the company went bankrupt. In January 2000 the government then filed suit against RSOC claiming that they had submitted Omniplans false invoices. It is... ...ay.com/news/nation/2003-02-02-safety-usat_x.htmDavid, L. (2000). Experimental spaceplane gets new lease on life. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from the humankind encompassing Web http//www.space.com/business applied science/technology/x33_newlease_001002.htmlDavid, L. (2001). NASA shuts down X-33, X-34 programs. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from the World Wide Web http//www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/x33_cancel_010301.htmlEisler, P. (2003). Criticism about aging spacecraft and safety gets new attention. USA Today. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from the World Wide Web http//www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-02-02-safety-usat_x.htmNelson, D. (2003). NASA problems. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from the World Wide Web http//www.nasaproblems.comSpires, S. (2003). OKeefe says local centers place in space is pivotal to agencys key programs. Marshall Space Flight Center news release. Retrieved March 1, 2003, from the World Wide Web http//std.msfc.nasa.gov/news/okeefe.htmlRetrieved March 1, 2003, from the World Wide Web http//www.aerospacecommission.gov/quick_facts.htmlRetrieved March 1, 2003, from the World Wide Web http//www.nasa.gov/about/budget/content/FY_2004_full_budget.pdf